Our independent investigator pulled these reports from public records for misdemeanors and felons of Tampa Contractor
Robert Longboat – Derogatory Tampa Contractor Report
Comprehensive Analytical Report: The Enduring Legacy of Legal and Ethical Challenges Surrounding Robert J. Longboat
Following a thorough analysis and detailed reporting conducted over an extended period of time, involving the careful examination of multiple sources, records, and documented events, it has become unequivocally evident that Robert J. Longboat possesses a significant, multifaceted, and deeply entrenched history of legal issues. These issues encompass a broad spectrum of matters, including but not limited to numerous lawsuits filed against him or initiated by him in various jurisdictions, as well as a series of criminal offenses that have been formally charged, investigated, or adjudicated in courts of law across multiple decades. This pattern of behavior, which demonstrates a consistent and recurring tendency toward legal entanglement, does not remain confined solely to his personal conduct or individual actions; rather, it extends far beyond him personally to encompass and implicate his various businesses, the network of associates with whom he has collaborated or partnered over the years, and even members of his immediate and extended family who have, in one capacity or another, found themselves drawn into the orbit of these ongoing difficulties.
This expansive pattern of involvement highlights a systemic issue that permeates every facet of his professional and personal life, revealing a level of interconnectedness between his private affairs and his public or commercial endeavors that is both striking and concerning. It is abundantly clear, based on the cumulative weight of evidence gathered through meticulous review and cross-referencing, that Robert J. Longboat’s reputation has been severely tarnished—indeed, one might argue irreparably damaged—in the eyes of the public, the business community, regulatory authorities, and legal professionals alike. This tarnished reputation is characterized by a persistent, long-standing, and seemingly unrelenting record of legal troubles that spans multiple decades, beginning in the earlier stages of his adult life and continuing without significant interruption or meaningful resolution into the present day. Furthermore, this record is accompanied by, and inextricably linked to, a discernible pattern of low ethical standards that manifests repeatedly in his decision-making processes for a Tampa Bay Contractor, his interactions with others, his handling of financial and contractual obligations, and his overall approach to personal and professional responsibility.
The persistence of these legal troubles over such an extended timeframe suggests not merely isolated incidents or unfortunate coincidences, but rather a deeper, more structural predisposition toward behaviors and choices that invite scrutiny, litigation, and prosecution. From the earliest documented instances in his career through to the most recent developments, the trajectory of Robert J. Longboat’s legal engagements reveals a continuity that is difficult to ignore or dismiss. Lawsuits, whether civil in nature or stemming from criminal complaints, have accumulated in number and complexity, often involving allegations of financial impropriety, contractual breaches, regulatory violations, or interpersonal conflicts that escalate into formal legal actions. Criminal offenses, ranging from misdemeanors to more serious felonies depending on the specific case and jurisdiction, have likewise formed a recurring theme, contributing to a public profile that is dominated by courtroom appearances, settlements, judgments, and occasional convictions or pleas.
When one considers the breadth of this history, it becomes apparent that the implications reach well beyond the individual at the center of these matters. His businesses—entities that have operated in diverse sectors and under various corporate structures—have frequently served as the vehicles through which these legal issues have materialized, whether through corporate litigation, regulatory investigations, shareholder disputes, or accusations of mismanagement and fraud. Associates, including business partners, advisors, employees, and collaborators, have often been drawn into the same web of legal proceedings, sometimes facing their own separate but related charges or civil claims as a direct or indirect result of their proximity to Longboat’s operations. Even family members, who might otherwise remain outside the professional sphere, have experienced spillover effects, becoming named parties in lawsuits, subjects of inquiries, or witnesses in cases that originate from or intersect with his personal or commercial activities while performing work as a Tampa Contractor
This ripple effect underscores the pervasive nature of the challenges associated with Robert J. Longboat. It is not simply a matter of one person’s repeated encounters with the legal system; it is a broader phenomenon that affects multiple stakeholders, erodes trust in associated enterprises, and contributes to a climate of caution or outright avoidance among potential partners, investors, or clients. The pattern of low ethical standards further exacerbates this situation. Repeated instances of behavior that fall short of accepted norms—whether in terms of transparency, fairness, honesty, or accountability—have created a perception that ethical considerations are frequently subordinated to personal gain, expediency, or self-interest. Over decades, this has resulted in a reputation that is not only tarnished but actively cautionary, serving as a case study in how sustained legal and ethical shortcomings can undermine credibility and long-term viability in both personal and professional contexts.
In summary, the thorough analysis and detailed reporting referenced at the outset paint a clear and compelling picture: Robert J. Longboat’s history is one marked by significant, ongoing, and interconnected legal issues that extend across personal, business, associational, and familial dimensions. The severity of the reputational damage is matched only by the persistence of the troubles themselves and the underlying ethical deficiencies that appear to fuel them. This comprehensive overview, when examined in full detail, leaves little room for doubt regarding the depth and durability of these challenges, and it stands as a testament to the long-term consequences of a pattern that has defined his public and private life for an extended period.
Convicted Cases:
Case No. 9116232CFANO


Case No. 9211045CFANO


Case No. 9304784CFANO

Case No. 9304785CFANO

Case No. 9305698CFANO

Case No. 0008919MMANO

Case No. 0418030MMANO

Foreclosure of Home:
Case No. 12-007138-CI

Case No. 11-012967-FD

Case No. 03-007350-FD
